<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New Scientist selling links on its website</title> <atom:link href="http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:15:22 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: pot-seo</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-1462</link> <dc:creator>pot-seo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:34:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-1462</guid> <description>Ajay, what is the price for only one dofollow link from the home page or any other sub page, please give price for both. I hope this blog would send an email back for reply if not, could you kindly send an email to the above mentioned.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajay, what is the price for only one dofollow link from the home page or any other sub page, please give price for both. I hope this blog would send an email back for reply if not, could you kindly send an email to the above mentioned.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Partha Goswami</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-1439</link> <dc:creator>Partha Goswami</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 05:13:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-1439</guid> <description>Hi Cavin, I agree with you. Google will be suspicious. The SERP &amp; PR of the website will be in trouble.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cavin, I agree with you. Google will be suspicious. The SERP &amp; PR of the website will be in trouble.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajay Kumar Singh</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-571</link> <dc:creator>Ajay Kumar Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:48:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-571</guid> <description>Yes I know they all belong to Reed Business Information Ltd., everyone knows that.
That is not the point whether they belong to same group or not.
The point here is linking an irrelevant website. New Scientist and Web Development have nothing in common.
Any one looking at that link would immediately come to conclusion that it is paid link before they realize that both belong to same company.
I wouldn&#039;t expect such a reputed Science Magazine website to do such blunder.
They could have gone for the Banner advert even though that would look odd.
It is crystal clear that they want to gain high ranking via linking (deliberately and from irrelevant website) from High PR and gain higher ranking in search results. This goes against Google&#039;s Policy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I know they all belong to Reed Business Information Ltd., everyone knows that.</p><p>That is not the point whether they belong to same group or not.</p><p>The point here is linking an irrelevant website. New Scientist and Web Development have nothing in common.</p><p>Any one looking at that link would immediately come to conclusion that it is paid link before they realize that both belong to same company.</p><p>I wouldn&#8217;t expect such a reputed Science Magazine website to do such blunder.</p><p>They could have gone for the Banner advert even though that would look odd.</p><p>It is crystal clear that they want to gain high ranking via linking (deliberately and from irrelevant website) from High PR and gain higher ranking in search results. This goes against Google&#8217;s Policy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Lester</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-566</link> <dc:creator>Paul Lester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:04:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-566</guid> <description>Haven&#039;t you noticed, they are the same company?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t you noticed, they are the same company?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajay Kumar Singh</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-261</link> <dc:creator>Ajay Kumar Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:59:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-261</guid> <description>If you have contacts in MIT or NASA and you manage to get a link as kind of free goodies then it is wonderful.
If you are planning to pay for it then forget about it.
Links are everything for Google Search Algorithm and if people start to buy links then there would be chaos.
Rich businesses would dominate the Internet while not so rich would be cornered.
If you have money you can buy millions of links and thus get top ranking on Google which will then defeat the fundamental philosophy of Google&#039;s search algorithm which is based on the free and organic result (Ahem!!!).
Buying and Selling links are not welcomed on Google even though 90% (as per my research) of businesses wouldn&#039;t mind to buy links.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have contacts in MIT or NASA and you manage to get a link as kind of free goodies then it is wonderful.</p><p>If you are planning to pay for it then forget about it.</p><p>Links are everything for Google Search Algorithm and if people start to buy links then there would be chaos.</p><p>Rich businesses would dominate the Internet while not so rich would be cornered.</p><p>If you have money you can buy millions of links and thus get top ranking on Google which will then defeat the fundamental philosophy of Google&#8217;s search algorithm which is based on the free and organic result (Ahem!!!).</p><p>Buying and Selling links are not welcomed on Google even though 90% (as per my research) of businesses wouldn&#8217;t mind to buy links.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neodymium</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-260</link> <dc:creator>Neodymium</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:15:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-260</guid> <description>Now I come to think of it, I woudn&#039;t mind having a link on the mainpage of the MIT or NASA website. I&#039;m willing to pay top dollar.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I come to think of it, I woudn&#8217;t mind having a link on the mainpage of the MIT or NASA website. I&#8217;m willing to pay top dollar.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hemant</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-259</link> <dc:creator>Hemant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:38:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-259</guid> <description>Hello Sir,
We are India based SEO Link Building company and we are interested in buying quality links from high PR website.
Kindly let me know how to buy link on New Scientist website?
Tx
Hemant</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Sir,<br
/> We are India based SEO Link Building company and we are interested in buying quality links from high PR website.</p><p>Kindly let me know how to buy link on New Scientist website?</p><p>Tx<br
/> Hemant</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Celina</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-258</link> <dc:creator>Celina</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:28:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-258</guid> <description>How much it would cost to get a link similar to Approved Index&#039;s link on New Scientist website?
Do they offer it only on home page rather than on all pages?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much it would cost to get a link similar to Approved Index&#8217;s link on New Scientist website?</p><p>Do they offer it only on home page rather than on all pages?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-257</link> <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:27:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-257</guid> <description>What a dumb way to build links.
Thousands of links from irrelevant site will not do any good, it looks so much spam.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a dumb way to build links.</p><p>Thousands of links from irrelevant site will not do any good, it looks so much spam.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ajay Kumar Singh</title><link>http://www.seochilli.com/google/new-scientist-selling-links-on-its-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-256</link> <dc:creator>Ajay Kumar Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:23:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.seochilli.com/?p=120#comment-256</guid> <description>Google turns blind eyes on big guys. Google&#039;s T&amp;C is biased towards well known website and even if they sell  links it would be ignored.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google turns blind eyes on big guys. Google&#8217;s T&amp;C is biased towards well known website and even if they sell  links it would be ignored.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
